Read about Patio furniture, Barbeque grills, fountains and more. Outdoor recreation ideas for urban inhabitants.

Bigfoot Press Conference Is A Big Joke

Bigfoot Refrigerator

Well, it looks like campers in Northern Georgia can sleep tight in their family tents this Labor Day, secure in the knowledge that there will be no late-night harrassment from bands of wild Sasquatch hell bent on wreaking havoc. Early reporters on today’s news conference in Palo Alto about the “Bigfoot” discovery were less than impressed with the “evidence” presented: scientists have not yet been assembled to study the creature’s body, which was also absent at the press conference, and the only “proof” shown at the conference was some more photos. The guy telling the story about finding Bigfoot does seem pretty sincere, though, so I am having a hard time deciding what to believe.

Here’s some video from the Bigfoot press conference, so you can judge for yourself:

August 15, 2008   No Comments

Sasquatch Strikes Again: The Georgia Bigfoot

Garden Yeti

Save the date: this Friday, August 15th, 2008 from 12 noon to 1 pm Pacific time.

That’s when two hunters plan to reveal the dead body of a Bigfoot they discovered in the Georgia wilderness at a press conference in Palo Alto, CA. I thought I knew just about all there was to know about Sasquatch investigations, but I have just discovered that there is a whole Georgian Bigfoot history that I knew nothing about. So if the press conference Friday turns out to be legitimate and not another Sasquatch hoax, this Bigfoot discovery may feel like a sort of victory for the people of Georgia.

Here’s a photo of the alleged Bigfoot:

David Naylor: Georgia Bigfoot

I am a little skeptical (and I’m not the only one), but I am still curious about the press conference. I hope it’s not just a publicity stunt!

August 13, 2008   1 Comment

Messing with Sasquatch

Sasquatch

I am a bit concerned/confused yet totally fascinated/intrigued with the series on the History Channel called MonsterQuest. I guess I can’t decide if the show is a good thing or a bad thing. I have a certain expectation that channels like History, Discovery, National Geographic, etc, provide entertainment that is informative and factual, but programs like MonsterQuest seem, at least on the surface, to detract some credibility from the History Channel. In spite of that, however, I find it somewhat encouraging that the History Channel takes on subjects like Sasquatch and the Loch Ness monster and does somewhat scientific research regarding the evidence. It’s like they are at least hearing the argument out, even if the evidence doesn’t add up.

The Sasquatch episode that was on this weekend was particularly engaging. A film/science team went to this cabin on the shore of Snow Lake in Manitoba that allegedly has been the scene of various Bigfoot encounters. The most compelling evidence recovered from the team was some blood and hair samples and a night vision video of the researches freaking out as rocks start being hurled at the cabin in the middle of the night by an unknown source. I found the night vision footage to be a little questionable; I couldn’t tell if all the researchers were accounted for inside the cabin, and supposedly one of the camera men was outside during the whole thing trying to catch the creature on video. The video basically shows his circling of the perimeter several times, which doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. The crew had one night vision camera in the house recording the freaked out researchers, then the other camera outside, haphazardly scanning the woods. I feel like legitimate scientists would not bother taking a camera inside the cabin and would instead try to position each of the cameras outside in such a way that they could consistently record the events in the areas covered by the lens, and then strategically position themselves with night vision binoculars or something in the areas not covered by camera. But, what do I know.

The sample that was used for DNA might be a little more convincing, almost as compelling as all the eyewitness accounts. It reportedly shows a structure that is similar to Human DNA but slightly different; of course the show conclude by saying they’d need another year at least to be certain that it was distinctly different DNA. I am interested in hearing about what they have to say at the end of that year. Because I kind of want to believe that Sasquatch is out there…

March 10, 2008   1 Comment